Agreement and DP-Internal Feature Distribution
نویسنده
چکیده
An implicit assumption in most Minimalist work is that DP as a whole carries all the φ-features with which external heads agree. In this paper I argue that under this assumption and the assumption that only a node that is φ-complete can delete the φ-features of a node with which it agrees, Chomsky’s (2000, 2001) model of feature valuation is incompatible with a large body of work on the DPinternal distribution of φ-features, according to which neither N nor D enter the derivation being φ-complete. I consider several possible solutions, and argue that this problem can most easily be avoided by adopting a feature sharing model of the operation Agree, as proposed by Frampton & Gutmann (2006) and Pesetsky & Torrego (2007). Finally, several implications for Chomsky’s theory of abstract Case are also discussed.
منابع مشابه
The Role of Agreement in Natural Language
In this paper, I push what I will call the “strong agreement” hypothesis: the Spec-head agreement configuration in (1) is the only configuration leading to the spell-out of agreement. If the presence of agreement signals a local Spec-head relation in the course of the derivation, agreement provides important clues as to the history of the derivation, and therefore provides valuable theoretical ...
متن کاملAgreement phrases in DP
In this paper, assuming that there is an intermediate functional category called Agreement Phrase (AGRP) in DP, I argue that an adnominal modifier such as a pre-nominal adjective or relative clause (RC) is base-generated in Spec,AGRP. In particular, I distinguish between Restrictive Adnominal Modifiers (RAM) and Non-restrictive Adnominal Modifiers (NAM), and argue that the NAM in head-final lan...
متن کاملTowards an Analysis of Concord (in Icelandic)
This paper concerns two related questions about the nature of agreement in language, and in particular, DP-internal head-modifier agreement, henceforth concord. First, are concord and argumentpredicate agreement, henceforth A-P agreement, instances of the same phenomenon occurring in different syntactic domains? In other words, is concord just a form of A-P agreement? Second, how can we use exi...
متن کاملAgreement in the Nominal Domain: A View from Icelandic
Introduction: A central question for the theory of agreement is whether DP-internal agreement (concord) and argument-predicate agreement (A-P agreement) are instances of the same phenomenon occurring in different syntactic domains. From a simplistic standpoint they are the same phenomenon: Both involve features of one linguistic item being morphologically marked on another. While there is a ric...
متن کاملTowards an analysis of concord (in Icelandic)
Introduction: A central question for the theory of agreement is whether DP-internal agreement (concord) and argument-predicate agreement (A-P agreement) are instances of the same phenomenon occurring in different syntactic domains. From a simplistic standpoint they are the same phenomenon: Both involve features of one linguistic item being morphologically marked on another. While there is a ric...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2010